Kim Kardashian SEC settlement (US$1.26M, October 2022)
Made clear that crypto-related endorsements without proper disclosure are legally costly.
Why we structured it this way
Three pieces of legal precedent shaped the program — each one a reason compensated crypto endorsements demand substantive disclosure.
Made clear that crypto-related endorsements without proper disclosure are legally costly.
Non-compliance can be fined up to US$53,088 per violation.
Treats compensated endorsements as adviser advertising — requiring substantive disclosure.
The result is a small, intentional program. Vetted educators only. Mandatory disclosure on every piece. Transparent compensation structure.
Curated, not crowdsourced
Tier 1 is the deepest commitment; Tier 3 is the lightest. Each is a distinct, named partnership level — graded by depth, not by width.
Established Spanish-language educational institutions and non-profit organizations.
Examples of fit
Engagement
Compensation
Disclosure
Established Spanish-language crypto educators with verifiable track records of substantive educational content over multiple years.
Vetting criteria
Examples of fit profile (illustrative; not commitments)
Engagement
Compensation
Disclosure mandatory
For educators we are early in evaluating, or for individual content collaboration without ongoing partnership.
We may provide
We do not provide
Disclosure
Non-negotiable
Every piece of partner content carries — visibly and at the start — these seven attestations. Reads like a Form ADV disclosure schedule because it is one.
“This [video / post / podcast episode] is sponsored by STAXIS. [Educator name] has been compensated by STAXIS for this content. Read the full disclosure terms at staxis.ai/educator-program/disclosures.”
Partners may NOT claim specific performance numbers (e.g., “STAXIS users made 30% last year”). They may discuss the architecture and the discipline.
SEC Marketing Rule 206(4)-1 and FTC §5 guidelines require performance claims to be substantiable and contextualized. We do this on our own surfaces; partners are not authorized to claim performance numbers on theirs.
In any mention of the 2.5%/3% breaker, the verbatim disclaimer must be included:
The 2.5%/3% circuit breaker is a technical risk control, NOT a guarantee of maximum loss. Market gaps, slippage, exchange outages, or technical failures may cause losses exceeding 3%. STAXIS does not insure against losses.
Spanish version (for events held in Spanish):
El circuit breaker del 2.5% / 3% diario es un control técnico de riesgo, NO una garantía de pérdida máxima. Slippage, gaps de mercado, outages del venue de ejecución, eventos de liquidez extrema, o fallas técnicas en STAXIS, en Privy, o en el exchange pueden ocasionar pérdidas que excedan el 3% diario. STAXIS no asegura contra pérdidas. El usuario es siempre el único titular de su capital y asume los riesgos correspondientes.
When mentioning the Performance tier (0% management + 20% performance), partners must include:
Performance fees apply only to qualified clients per Advisers Act Rule 205-3 (US$2.7M+ net worth).
When introducing STAXIS to US audiences, partners must mention:
STAXIS geoblocks New York and gates California pending DFAL compliance.
Partners must NEVER say:
Argentine partners targeting an AR audience must include the PSAV legend per CNV RG 994/2024 + RG 1058/2025.
Transparent
We publish compensation ranges so prospective partners and audiences understand the incentives.
Why flat, not variable
Variable compensation (per-signup, per-funded-account, ongoing revenue share) creates regulatory exposure because:
Flat fees per content piece means:
This structure means we attract educators who genuinely think STAXIS is a quality product — not educators looking to maximize affiliate revenue.
Application-based, deliberately selective
Five steps from application to ongoing partnership. The program is deliberately slow at the gate — vetting alone runs four to six weeks.
Why this program is different
STAXIS does NOT operate any of the following patterns common in crypto-product affiliate programs.
Risk: Regulatory; brand-degrading; manipulates audience.
Risk: SEC may treat as unregistered securities offering; FTC Endorsement Guides; criminal risk.
Risk: SEC Advisers Act §205 (only qualified clients can pay performance fees); creates aligned-incentive problem if the affiliate also discusses performance.
Risk: We don’t run this either. Our retail tiers are priced at fair value; we don’t need referral manipulation.
Risk: SEC investment adviser registration uncertainty; FINRA concerns; mass-audience concerns.
Risk: Cannot verify track record; cannot enforce disclosure obligations; cannot screen for sanctions.
Risk: FTC Endorsement Guides up to US$53,088 per violation; Kardashian precedent (US$1.26M).
Our program is conservative and disciplined by design. The brand requires it.