Calibration Reports

Every month, the reckoning.

Every month, STAXIS publishes a Calibration Report — an audit-grade reckoning with how the swarms actually performed. It contains:

  • What we predicted — per swarm, pre-registered
  • What we realized
  • Where we were wrong
  • What we changed in response
  • Governance stage transitions
  • Brier score evolution

No backtested performance is shown here. No curated success stories. Just the audit-grade reckoning with how the swarms performed.

APR 2026MAY 2026STAXISNO. 07CalibrationReportJUN 2026

Why we publish these

Most platforms publish marketing. We publish calibration data — including the misses.

Three reasons we do this. Read them as the three pillars the report rests on.

THE REPORTSAGECAREDEFENSE
01

Sage archetype

The discipline of publishing predictions and then publishing reality is the brand. A platform that won’t show you its predicted-vs-realized doesn’t trust its own discipline.

02

Caregiver archetype

We protect users from cognitive bias. If we only published wins, you’d have a distorted view of swarm reliability. By publishing misses, you can calibrate your own expectations honestly.

03

Regulatory defensibility

The 2023 SEC enforcement actions on hypothetical performance advertising taught the industry that selectively presenting performance is dangerous. By publishing the full distribution — predicted and realized, hits and misses — STAXIS sits on the right side of the regulatory line.

The Calibration Report is the brand. The discipline of publishing it monthly, even when the month was bad, is what separates STAXIS from predator-style platforms that disappear after a bad quarter.

What’s in a report

Seven sections. The same anatomy every month.

Each Calibration Report carries the same structure, so a reader can compare any month to any other.

  1. 01

    Executive summary

    Stage transitions; key events; high-level calibration results.

  2. 02

    Per-swarm detail

    For each swarm:

    • Stage status (paper / canary / live / degraded / retired)
    • Pre-registered hypotheses for the month
    • Predicted-vs-realized outcomes
    • Brier score for the month + trailing 90-day
    • Notable misses with diagnostic
    • Breaker trigger events (if any)
  3. 03

    Governance transitions

    Any stage changes — promotion, demotion, retirement — with rationale.

  4. 04

    Infrastructure events

    Audit-log integrity check results; SOC 2 readiness status; security incidents (zero reported = zero).

  5. 05

    Commentary

    Carlos’s technical commentary on architecture observations. Carolina’s commentary on operational observations.

  6. 06

    What we got wrong

    A standing section. Even in months where most went right, we identify what we’d do differently.

  7. 07

    Roadmap update

    What’s next month; what’s been deferred.

Reports are typically 12–20 pages. PDF available for subscribers; an HTML version is readable on web. See the sample report for the structure, redacted of specific performance numbers.

Subscribe

Two ways to read every month.

Public summary

Free

Monthly email

Monthly email with the executive summary, stage transitions, and infrastructure events. No specific performance numbers; suitable for any reader.

Subscribe to public summary →

Full report

Plus & above

Plus / Power / Performance / Enterprise

The complete report with predicted-vs-realized detail. Included with the Plus tier and above.

See subscription tiers →

The full report mentions the 2.5% / 3% daily technical circuit breaker, which is a technical risk control, NOT a guarantee of maximum loss; market gaps, slippage, exchange outages, or technical failures may cause losses exceeding 3%. See the Risk Disclosure. Past performance is not indicative of future results.